Game phone special comparison: Red Magic VS Black Shark, who wins? -part 2

Excluding the difference in storage and storage capacity, from the perspective of other hardware configurations, the Xiaomi Black Shark mobile phone uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chip, an independent graphics processing chip, dual camera, frontal fingerprint recognition, and a 4000 mAh battery capacity design. We used the ANTUTU to test the performance of two mobile phones for your reference. In terms of running points, the Black Shark equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 has about 27% better CPU performance than the Red Magic with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, and the GPU has about 27% better performance. This data is more in line with Qualcomm's official performance. The advertised Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 has a 24%~30% performance increase over 835.

However, since the performance of the Snapdragon 835 has been able to meet the requirements of most games with full picture quality, the performance gap between the two does not represent their actual game experience. Let's take a look at the "being born for the game". What designs do they bring?

In the era when the glass body and the back of the arc started, the Red Magic and Xiaomi Black Shark with uneven backs were more like two "different". If you look closely, you will find that they all have a similar design, that is, they all use a type X design language on the back of the mobile phone. The former is similar to Razer in color and design style; The water chestnut design and RGB light strips of the latter are a little “tribute” to Alienware's taste.

The same design language has brought about the difference in thickness that can be seen with the naked eye in order to balance the touch and join the cooling technology and materials. Judging from the actual perception and grip, the Black Shark mobile phone is definitely a little thicker than the Red Magic. However, the weights of the two are equivalent, one is 185g (Red Magic) and the other is 190g (Black Shark).